Laserfiche WebLink
October 21, 2004 <br />Page 4 <br />D. Approval To Enter Into Agreement With AT&T Wireless Services To <br />Establish Cellular Communications Site At Sunset Hills Park <br />Friedl referenced the documentation, and provided background information. <br />He stated that AT&T has secured approval from the City of Thousand Oaks <br />Planning Commission for a six foot antenna on top of an existing street light <br />in City's public right-of-way, Sunset Hills Park is the current focus for a <br />cellular communication site, it would be similar to the cell site at Conejo <br />Creek North, an existing light standard would be used, the proposed lease <br />area for the vault would be immediately behind the park entrance sign, staff <br />is requiring the similar terms and conditions established in previous <br />agreements with AT&T, rental fee will start at $1,200 per month and <br />increase annually by 3%, carrier access to and from the lease area for <br />routine maintenance will be limited to the shortest path of travel from Erbes <br />Road, the easement is approximately 12 feet wide by 85 feet long and is <br />needed to access the equipment vault, and similar wireless proposals are <br />anticipated for other parks. <br />Joan Stewart, consultant, Infranext Inc., said that the underground vault <br />would be 11 feet by 17 feet. <br />In response to Board inquiries, Friedl said that AT&T will enter into an <br />option with the District to allow time to investigate site suitability and obtain <br />all necessary approvals. <br />Gibson requested that staff consult with the City regarding cell site issues <br />along the Erbes Road corridor. <br />It was moved by Gibson, seconded by Berger, and carried 5-0 to <br />authorize the District to enter <br />Services for the purpose of <br />site at Sunset Hills Park. <br />9. ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION <br />None <br />10. REPORTS AND ANNOUNCEMENTS <br />into an agreement with AT&T Wireless <br />establishing a cellular communications <br />A. Budget Performance Report-- September 2004 — No Comment <br />