My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
011923
ConejoRPD
>
Public Access
>
Archive
>
Board Meetings
>
Minutes
>
2023
>
011923
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/21/2023 10:50:21 AM
Creation date
2/21/2023 10:50:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board
Document Type
Minutes
Date
1/19/2023
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
January 19, 2023 <br />Page 3 <br />Chaise Rasheed, Thousand Oaks, called Map 111 C a dilution of the Hispanic community <br />and that it is unacceptable. <br />Willie Lubka, Thousand Oaks, supports Map 110 and Map 107b as the best options for <br />community divisions. <br />Betsy Connolly, Thousand Oaks, reported she is a member of a working committee that <br />developed criteria and assessment of the maps. She shared the criteria and asked the <br />Board to choose a map that respects the community and puts the interest of the community <br />ahead of the interest of preserving Director's positions. <br />Tie Gutierrez, Thousand Oaks, expressed agreement with much of what other public <br />speakers have said this evening. <br />Via Zoom: <br />Rita Henry expressed support for Map 110 as her first choice and Map 107b second choice. <br />Jackson Piper, Newbury Park, referenced the Lynch diagram which uses a different <br />method of drawing map boundaries. He agrees with the other public comments and <br />supports their suggestions. <br />Clint (no last name given), supports Map 110. <br />Krista Koch, echoed what all the previous speakers have said. <br />Huffer thanked all the speakers who have participated in the mapping process from its <br />inception. <br />Comments and discussion ensued among Board members. The Board members <br />participated in three rounds of voting, beginning with their top three maps, then top two, <br />and then first choice. <br />Divisions 1 and 5 will be up for election in 2024 and Divisions 2, 3 and 4 in 2026. <br />It was moved by Lange, seconded Buss, and carried 5-0, to adopt Resolution <br />Number 011923-A selecting a director division map (Map 110) for use in the <br />November 2024 elections and thereafter, completing the transition from at -large <br />voting to division -based voting. <br />Huffer closed the public hearing. <br />8. ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION <br />9. NEW ITEMS <br />A. Confirmation of Board Appointments and Assignments <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.