Laserfiche WebLink
RECENT PDF HISTORY <br />FY 18/19 <br />$ <br />474,895 <br />FY 17/18 <br />$ <br />459,925 <br />FY 16/17 <br />$ <br />730,824 <br />FY 15/16 <br />$ <br />699,736 <br />FY 14/15 <br />$ <br />810,854 <br />FY 13/14 <br />$ <br />551,285 <br />FY 12/13 <br />$ <br />435,973 <br />FY 11/12 <br />$ <br />0 <br />FY 10/11 <br />$ <br />38,045 <br />FY 09/10 <br />$ <br />4,570 <br />However, the trend of dwindling park dedication fee revenue is expected to continue. Thus, the <br />District must rely more heavily on other types of revenues (such as partnerships, grants, <br />donations, intergovernmental collaboration, and the assessment districts) to support capital <br />improvement projects. <br />In the TEN-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN, a conservative assumption of zero dollars <br />(with the exception of predicted fees from Thousand Oaks Boulevard Specific Plan in Year 2) in <br />future Park Dedication Fees was utilized. <br />Grants <br />In general, the amount of existing park land and household income demographics are factors <br />affecting the competitiveness of District grant applications. Recently, however, the District has <br />been successful in receiving $1,760,000 from the Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy through <br />Prop 1 for Sapwi Trails Community Park, as well as a $2,500,000 grant from the City of Thousand <br />Oaks, also for Sapwi. This 2 -year capital budget does not (with the exception of potential <br />$3,000,000 grant from the City of Thousand Oaks for the expansion and renovation of the Teen <br />Center and renovation of the Goebel Adult Community Center) rely upon any outside agency <br />grants, although staff will continue to seek grant opportunities on the local, state, and federal <br />levels, that may have a reasonable likelihood of success. <br />Assessment District 62-1 (Districtwide) <br />A significant source of both capital funds, as well as funds for operations and maintenance, is the <br />property owner/voter-approved Districtwide Assessment. Since it was approved by the voters in <br />2001, the Districtwide Assessment has been the largest source of reliable revenue for capital <br />projects. However, as anticipated, as the new capital projects have been completed, the <br />Districtwide Assessment must cover more and more of the operational costs of these new parks <br />and facilities. Thus, of all the funds generated by the Districtwide Assessment, approximately 53% <br />is used for capital (v. 47% for operational). Whereas, in Fiscal Year 2007-08, approximately 60% <br />was used for capital and 40% for operational. <br />