Laserfiche WebLink
Financial Strateg Session <br />February 14, 2013 <br />Page 3 <br />Water Costs <br />The Distnct`s�.'ater costs ;+ave increased rar,a ',--ali+ _ even. as the s°,�znunt'1#vv- ate r -n Distri c` <br />uses On a ''per ac;e' basis ha: acfirJed AithCLC-ho he race. of V.'at.?' Nrica <br />Increases is expected t! SIS`.;, caverin in'crsasEd 3�'eis y+td7r. limited .,r' zar=y tax increases 's a <br />challenge <br />Pension Costs <br />Market forces and s-.,anges in CaIPERS actuarial a$sumpti0r�7 are driving ircrsases in pension <br />costs. As noted above, the District remained in conservative formulas and re;^:2- employees do <br />not receive full pension bsrefits until age 67. The Employer's share of pension costs is <br />estimated tc rise from S.6% of payroll tc approximately 11.0% by -0 ,7-t3, <br />Health Care <br />NlIarl: provisiorsof -he Fstlart Prnacti^r'so-a fi raiable 09reAc" (PPACA <br />✓ V VV. \}. Wl r I M V V J Jn'1 i <br />as "H'sal-t:hc9-9 Ref_"rm A •c#cr rse-,;a .affective on .a'Lary `+ 0,:mer <br />'hers ars 3tiPM 3eV�'a! , :Ieiie, Fat►^!" s3L53+ 'C+c� L"'ss *1 at tere i',:*, j"$; j:,Csljr definej �Di3'!r!c' <br />st a!= riLin '--03 t "':?. if :+r 3 s,7 o!L): `"i en:s :'f �i+-fA. as well as +.rs'.PEi?� 3 r?spt7n5e .o it_ in <br /><rdyr n manage ,?s ffsc-r on tip Dist.w=�` <br />Other Post-Emp`'cyment Benefits - ReVree Med}cai (OPEB - GASB 45) <br />in its actuarial raptor; as of -I0v ' 2011, the District's Ur%rded Actuarial Acc�-aed Liability was <br />estimated to be bst teerp 475 millior; and $5.0 million depending on the investment earnings <br />(discount rate) the funds are p_.-oia.c1er_i to generate. The Normal Cost ranges from $192,000 to <br />5325=0 arnua''y <br />in 2008, the Board approvea, _e`tirg aside $3.7 million to fund file accrued costs along w& <br />annually budgeting ar estimated amourt fnr each year's cost The dif#er'er.cs between the <br />annually budgeted amount anti the amount actually paid to retirees each •gear has been added <br />to the initial reserve, vvhich totals $4.6 million as of June 30, 2012. <br />The District considw~ed and has determined not to put these ressr,. e funds into an rre: ocaE✓;a <br />trust with CaIPERS There are other methods b.,- which fund the increasirr annual ccsts <br />and remaining 11abiliv outsite of CaIPERS. <br />The State Budget <br />vVitn the passage of Prop 30 and the slowly improving economy, current reports indicate that <br />the State yf California will not be iookirta to local government for resources this year. 711e <br />`" Employees new to CaIPERS system w NNith a gap in service exceeding 6 montk.s. <br />HILLCR=3TCEr'iTER_ ar• +E3T -1 RR -ST E. T 4:,"�:� CS!+_ F:cRf.I A 'D1360 4223 <br />