My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
011896
ConejoRPD
>
Public Access
>
Archive
>
Board Meetings
>
Minutes
>
1996
>
011896
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/15/2016 4:55:12 PM
Creation date
8/15/2016 4:54:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board
Document Type
Minutes
Date
1/18/1996
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Minutes 1-18-95 <br />Page 5 <br />Gillette suggested start Curtner investigate: an alcohol <br />prohibition for the park, improvements for potential <br />programing opportunities in the park, placement and <br />modification of the architectural design of the restroom, <br />and mitigation measures to ensure homeowner privacy. <br />Sorensen noted that Shapell is required to develop a six- <br />foot high masonry wall in that area. Gillette said that <br />an additional basketball court could be added in the <br />future if warranted, and he stated his support of the <br />motion detector lighting on the pathways, if the majority <br />of the community is supportive of it. <br />In response to Ireland's inquiry, Gillette and Sorensen <br />indicated that staff will continue to investigate and <br />work sensitively with the homeowners' group to <br />accommodate the issues raised, but decisions on major <br />cost issues such as an expanded tot -lot or an additional <br />basketball court would require specific Board direction. <br />Ireland thanked the Board and staff. <br />Frank Fay, representing Shapell Industries, thanked staff <br />for the positive process, and he clarified that there <br />would be one basketball court at this time and that, if <br />another one is to be added in the future, it would be at <br />District's expense, not Shapell's. <br />Holt restated the motion. <br />The motion carried unanimously, 5-0. <br />Gillette expressed appreciation to the homeowners and <br />Shapell Industries. Ward stated that the park <br />represented a partnership involving the District, Shapell <br />and the homeowners, he thanked staff for its efforts, <br />and he said he looks forward to a continued positive <br />dialogue. <br />In response to Jacobsen's inquiry, Sorensen said that <br />park construction is expected to begin in May, although <br />delays are possible. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.