Laserfiche WebLink
June 24, 2004 <br />Page 3 <br />8. NEW ITEMS <br />A. Adoption Of Resolution Number 062404-A Approving Engineer's <br />Report, Confirming Diagram And Assessment And Ordering Levy Of <br />Assessment For Districtwide Park Maintenance And Recreation <br />Improvement District (AD 62-1) <br />Holt declared the Public Hearing open. <br />Friedl referenced the documentation, ana stated: the Public Hearing and <br />documentation had been properly noticed; on May 13, 2004 the Board <br />approved the Preliminary Engineer's Report and set the date, time and <br />place for the Public Hearing to consider approving the Engineer's Report, <br />confirming the diagram and assessment and ordering the levy of <br />assessment for fiscal year 2004-05; in order to keep existing facilities <br />maintained at a level the public currently enjoys, staff is recommending <br />authorization of $848,000, originally proposed for capital improvement, be <br />used for park maintenance; the proposed changes are now incorporated in <br />the Final Engineer's Report and Budget. Friedl noted the presence of <br />Jeanette Hynson of Shilts Consultants, Inc. who was available to answer <br />questions. <br />Holt declared the Public Hearing closed. <br />It was moved by Berger, seconded by Jacobsen, and carried 5-0 to <br />adopt Resolution Number 062404-A Approving the Engineer's Report, <br />Confirming the Diagram and Assessment and Ordering the Levy of <br />Assessment for the Districtwide Park Maintenance and Recreation <br />Improvement District (AD 62-1); that it be read in title only and all other <br />readings be waived. <br />B. Authorization To Award Contract For Lang Ranch Community Park <br />Environmental Documentation To EDAW, Incorporated <br />Pluth stated that the award of contract for the Lang Ranch Community Park <br />environmental documentation is a critical aspect of the Lang Ranch Master <br />Plan project, and noted the presence of Tom Larkin, vice-president, and <br />Eric Wilson of EDAW, Incorporated. He highlighted the selection process <br />and methodology used, and stated that in April 2004 a Request For <br />Proposal (RFP) was prepared, advertised and made available to consultant <br />firms, nine copies of the RFP were distributed and four proposals were <br />received; staff reviewed all four proposals and convened an outside <br />