My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
052704
ConejoRPD
>
Public Access
>
Archive
>
Board Meetings
>
Minutes
>
2004
>
052704
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/9/2016 2:20:10 PM
Creation date
8/9/2016 2:19:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board
Document Type
Minutes
Date
5/27/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
May 27, 2004 <br />Page 3 <br />by the California Special Districts Association (CSDA) and supplemental revenue <br />enhancement information prepared by Dr. Benton. <br />He said that the best estimate as to the impact on non -enterprise districts, such as <br />Conejo Recreation and Park District (CRPD), is a transfer of 25 percent of net <br />property taxes in each of two years; for CRPD this translates to an estimated loss <br />of $2,337,250 in the first year and $2,500,000 in year two. <br />He identified strategies to sustain District operations and preserve resources over <br />the next two years, including: defer selected capital projects funded by the <br />districtwide assessment and general fund revenues; postpone general fund capital <br />expenditures, except those providing operational savings, revenue enhancement <br />or health and safety benefits; retain existing personnel while affecting savings <br />through attrition and an associated hiring freeze, except where extraordinary <br />circumstances dictate otherwise; seek additional revenue enhancements; consider <br />short term intra -fund loans, coupled with reimbursement plans; protect reserves <br />through the creation of a line of credit that may be accessed as necessary and <br />subsequently retired with assessed valuation growth in the out years. He said that <br />the guidelines will be implemented through the budget process and through <br />specific proposals for Board consideration. Ward answered Board inquiries. <br />The meeting recessed at 8:05 pm and reconvened at 8:09 pm to allow Board <br />members time to review the supplemental revenue enhancement information. <br />Ward commended senior staff for their budgetary efforts under very difficult <br />circumstances. <br />Gibson said that with certain caveats and further information, he supports the <br />guidelines. He recommended that a letter be drafted in support of the Governor's <br />compromise. <br />It was moved by Gibson, seconded by Berger, and carried 4-0 to direct staff <br />to return with a budget and related proposals reflecting the guidelines <br />discussed as the blueprint for the short-term financial strategy for the <br />District, and to acknowledge staff's intent to increase overall program fee <br />revenue by approximately 10 percent. <br />Gibson suggested that an informational message explaining the State budget <br />crisis and its impact on the District be part of the fall brochure. <br />As there was no one in attendance who wished to address the Board, the Public <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.