My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
OFF LEASH DOG AREAS
ConejoRPD
>
Public Access
>
Archive
>
Board Meetings
>
Agendas
>
2015
>
101515
>
OFF LEASH DOG AREAS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/27/2016 12:00:02 PM
Creation date
7/27/2016 11:56:00 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
88
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
INTRODUCTION <br />As a result of neighborhood meetings conducted in May 2014 at Kimber Park, Walnut <br />Grove Park, and Estella Park, and to address the concerns (generally regarding <br />potential increased traffic, noise, and attendance) of the local residents of future <br />potential Off -Leash Areas, the Conejo Recreation and Park District (District) performed <br />site studies at all three parks. <br />These studies were conducted over a 13 -hour period, from 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m., on <br />the Tuesday, Thursday, and Saturday of one week per park — a baseline study in the <br />Summer of 2014 and a comparative study during the Summer of 2015. The baseline <br />study was conducted prior to the implementation of the installation (which occurred in <br />March 2015) of Temporary Off -Leash Areas at each park; the comparative study was <br />conducted after the installation of the Temporary Off -Leash Areas. <br />For traffic, as recommended by the City of Thousand Oaks traffic division, the standard <br />interval of 15 minutes of recording was employed. <br />Noise (Sound) levels were recorded by measuring sound in decibels three times per <br />day at low, ambient, and high levels. For each recording, the District representative <br />circled the park and read and recorded the meter at various locations. For further <br />explanation and information on the sound recording methods, please see the <br />"Definitions and References" on the next page. <br />Park attendance was also recorded. Two categories were made: one for patrons with <br />dogs, the other for patrons without dogs. It should be noted that the patrons, not the <br />dogs, were counted. Two patrons with one dog between them were each counted as a <br />patron with a dog. Furthermore, one patron with multiple dogs was still only counted as <br />one patron with a dog. This, however, was a rare occasion and such instances were in <br />the minority. <br />In the Data Appendix, raw data from the 2014 site studies is displayed alongside the <br />data collected from the 2015 site studies. For easier comparison, the data is graphically <br />presented in exhibits throughout this report. <br />The efforts of patrons cleaning up their dog's waste was observed and recorded at each <br />park. <br />11 Page <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.