My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
SUPPLEMENTAL INFO
ConejoRPD
>
Public Access
>
Archive
>
Board Meetings
>
Agendas
>
2024
>
071824
>
SUPPLEMENTAL INFO
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2024 6:26:03 PM
Creation date
7/17/2024 6:25:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board
Document Type
Agenda
Date
7/18/2024
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
in <br />It's also worth noting the Environmental Report in this Board Meeting Packet <br />says a biologist visited the equestrian center April 10, 2023 and an arborist <br />visited on May 3, 2023 as part of the environment analysis of the new East Arena <br />plan. So the new East Arena plan had actually been finalized late 2022 or early <br />2023. The biologist and arborist visits for the report were well before our May 31, <br />2023 email asking if there are any developments. Yet we were told nothing, until <br />a year later. <br />Bottom line: The HOAs only learned about all this in May 2024. We find the <br />secretive process and lack of good -faith negotiation used by CRPD the past 1.5 <br />years to be unacceptable. <br />Finally, the fourth topic is the West Arena. <br />• We have been informed that discussions about a West Arena lighting project are <br />now on indefinite hold. <br />The original obnoxious proposal in Nov -2021 was six 50 ft poles with 3 sports type <br />LED light fixtures on each pole to light an arena that is only about 80 ft from Lynn <br />Road, and near many of our homes. And it's about twice the size of a normal <br />equestrian arena. <br />• If that type of West Arena proposal is ever reintroduced in the future, our opposition <br />effort will involve mobilizing significant homeowner action including: sending <br />communications to CRPD and City Council, submitting letters to local newspapers, <br />objecting at CRPD Board and City Council meetings, potentially picketing the <br />equestrian center, etc. <br />• We would also work with whoever is elected this November as the Newbury Park <br />Representative to the CRPD Board to oppose the project. <br />• The opposition effort would also involve utilizing attorneys to stop the project by <br />various legal means. <br />• We are hopeful CRPD and Ride -On will not ever propose the West Arena lighting <br />project again, but we'll monitor the situation and be ready if that happens. <br />Thank you, <br />Mark Jones, Ed Cruz, Gary Pancer, Mark Lunn <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.