My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
SUPPLEMENTAL INFO ITEM 9A
ConejoRPD
>
Public Access
>
Archive
>
Board Meetings
>
Agendas
>
2020
>
041620
>
SUPPLEMENTAL INFO ITEM 9A
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2020 1:38:46 PM
Creation date
4/15/2020 1:37:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board
Document Type
Agenda
Date
4/16/2020
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
PAGE 22 <br />District2. A survey of park and recreation facility usage conducted by SCI Consulting <br />Group found that less than 5% of the Park District's facility usage is by those who do not <br />live or work within District boundaries.3 <br />When people outside the Improvement District use parks, they diminish the availability of <br />parks for people within the Improvement District. Therefore, another 5% of general benefits <br />are allocated for people within the Improvement District. This is another measure of <br />general benefits to property within the Improvement District. <br />TOTAL GENERAL BENEFITS <br />Using a sum of these four measures of general benefit, we find that approximately 22.0% <br />of the benefits conferred by the Improvements may be general in nature and should be <br />funded by sources other than the assessment. <br />General Benefit Calculation <br />9.4% (Outside the Assessment District) <br />+ 2.6% (Property within the District) <br />+ 5.0% (Public at Large) <br />+ 5.0% (Property within the District) <br />= 22.0% (Total General Benefit) <br />Although this analysis finds that 22.0% of the assessment may provide general benefits, <br />the Assessment Engineer establishes a requirement for a minimum contribution from <br />sources other than the assessments of 35%. This minimum contribution above the <br />measure of general benefits will serve to provide additional coverage for any other general <br />benefits. <br />The Park District's total budget for maintenance and improvement of its parks and <br />recreational facilities is $11,835,635. Of this total budget amount, the Park District will <br />contribute $8,234,253 from sources other than the assessments for park maintenance and <br />operation. This contribution by the Park District equates to approximately 70% of the total <br />budget for maintenance and improvements and constitutes far more than the amount <br />2 . When District facilities are used by those individuals, the facilities are not providing benefit to <br />property within the Park District. Use under these circumstances is a measure of general benefit. For <br />example, a non-resident who is drawn to utilize the Park District facilities and shops at local businesses <br />while in the area would provide special benefit to business properties as a result of his or her use of the <br />Improvements. Conversely, one who uses Park District facilities but does not reside, work, shop or own <br />property within the Park District boundaries does not provide special benefits to any property and is <br />considered to be a measure of the general benefits. <br />3 . A total of 200 park users were surveyed on different days and times during the months of December <br />2000 and January 2001. Eleven respondents (5.5%) indicated that they did not reside or work within <br />the Park District. <br />CONDO RECREATION & PARK DISTRICT <br />PARK MAINTENANCE & RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT ' oC'1sult11"1gtacroup <br />ENGINEER'S REPORT, FY 2020-21 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.