My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
THERAPEUTIC FACILITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT
ConejoRPD
>
Public Access
>
Archive
>
Board Meetings
>
Agendas
>
2017
>
072017
>
101917
>
THERAPEUTIC FACILITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/12/2017 7:03:55 PM
Creation date
10/12/2017 7:01:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board
Document Type
Agenda
Date
10/19/2017
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Rochelle Callis <br />CRPD Therapeutic Recreation Program Final Report and Recommendations <br />September 8, 2017 page 35 <br />C. Based on the leisure interest survey findings, build on to Marview with current renovation; or <br />D. In partnership with other jurisdictions, repurpose, add onto, or build a facility that serves the <br />entire region in the form of a JPA. <br />S. Is a partnership with neighboring communities or entities possible, and what would such a <br />partnership look like? <br />It is a strong possibility. <br />The District is already a participant in two joint powers authorities and found both to be effective <br />way to optimize District resources. In our study of comparables, the joint agreement in northern <br />Illinois (SRACLC) has a gross population nearly identical to CRPD but has eight full-time employees, <br />not two, providing both therapeutic recreation and recreation for people with disabilities. <br />A JPA is a great tool, but it does require that participating entities share authority as well as mission <br />and culture. In our comparables review, we did see culture differences, such as "we provide <br />therapeutic recreation" and "we provide recreation for people with disabilities". It will require a <br />meeting of the minds to make a JPA succeed, but it can be done and has been done. <br />Creating a JPA for this purpose requires participation by the CRPD governing board and leadership <br />by CRPD staff. it also needs the same from the governing boards and staffs of potential partner <br />jurisdictions. A JPA succeeds because all parties benefit. Making those benefits clear to any <br />prospective partner jurisdiction will be important. <br />The partnership could take several forms. One form would be a JPA that includes just park and <br />recreation districts and the municipalities in Conejo Valley and Simi Valley. This could include the <br />Rancho Simi Recreation and Park District, the City of Oxnard, and any other jurisdiction (Camarillo?) <br />in Ventura County. The District could also approach jurisdictions in Los Angeles County. Another <br />form could be the inclusion of non -profits, alongside local governments, in the JPA. This could <br />include Tri -Countries Regional Center. There is some precedent here, as the State is already a <br />partner with CRPD in another JPA. <br />This option has the potential to optimize CRPD resources. It should be a subject of discussion by <br />the Board and staff leadership in the next fiscal year. <br />G. If programs are to expand, how many more staff are required? <br />We think the TR Program is currently understaffed. Expansion would require separating <br />professional staff to manage inclusion, assessments, recruitment, and training of support staff. <br />One model for staff tasking that we have seen succeed include having one CTRS (or RTC) <br />responsible for programs for children, another for adults and still another responsible for older <br />THE W -T GRAS <br />DBA RECREATION ACCESSIBILITY CONSULT .0 <br />ONE SOURCE. INFINITE SOLUTIONS. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.