My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
061109
ConejoRPD
>
Public Access
>
Archive
>
Board Meetings
>
Agendas
>
2009
>
061109
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/27/2017 4:30:55 PM
Creation date
6/27/2017 4:18:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board
Document Type
Agenda
Date
6/11/2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
196
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
set up to spend more money each year than it reliably receives in recurring revenues. Elaborating on <br />the State's financial condition is beyond the scope of this budget memo: However, from the <br />perspective of a recreation and park district trying to offer the best recreation programs and park <br />facilities possible, it is worth noting that since 1992/1993 the State has shifted approximately <br />$26,700,000 in local property tax revenue from the Conejo Recreation and Park District to pay for <br />State obligations. This has been referred to as the Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund or <br />"ERAF" shift of property taxes from cities, counties and special districts to the State of California. <br />After years of these ongoing property tax transfers from local governments to the state government - <br />and the ever-present specter of the State taking even more local property tax revenues - the voters <br />passed an Initiative to limit the State's- ability to take money from local governments to pay for state <br />services. This initiative was approved by nearly 84% of the voters in 2004. Now the State cannot <br />simply take local revenue, but may, under certain conditions, borrow local property tax revenues to be <br />repaid with interest before they can borrow again within 10 years. <br />In an effort to balance its budget, the State is considering borrowing 8% ($2 billion) of property taxes <br />from local government. Although cities, counties and districts throughout the state oppose such <br />action, it remains part of the Governor's recommended budget balancing plan. One scenario <br />includes taking one-quarter of the amount ($500 million) from enterprise special districts, which, <br />assuming the remainder was equally allocated, would mean less than an 8% take -away from m non - <br />enterprise districts (such as CRPD). Eight percent (8%) of the District's property taxes is <br />approximately $1,000,000. <br />The question of whether the State will indeed borrow local government money has not been formally <br />and finally decided as of this writing. Since local governments (cities, counties and special districts) <br />are facing budget challenges (especially falling sales tax, transient occupancy tax, property tax) <br />similar to the State, the State may yet determine that a "shot -gun loan" from local governments is an <br />imprudent and harmful approach to solving its financial problems. The attached proposed two-year <br />budget does not include state property tax takeaways. If the State, in fact, borrows District funds, the <br />District will need to make a policy decision regarding whether to further cut current year services or <br />use reserves to fund the loan. <br />Local Level <br />Conejo Valley businesses, governments and residents are certainly facing economic challenges not <br />experienced in many years. The City of Thousand Oaks is reporting drops in sales taxes & transient <br />occupancy taxes while also experiencing reduced fee-based revenue associated with construction <br />permits. The drop in real estate sales activity and prices has been dramatic. With the decline in the <br />housing market comes a reduction in the pace at which property tax revenue grows. Fortunately, the <br />Conejo Valley was approaching build -out prior to the run up in housing prices in the early 2000s and <br />as a result, there are fewer property tax re -assessments than in communities that experienced much <br />more new development during that time. Accordingly, property taxes (the Districts primary revenue <br />source) are forecasted to be generally flat for the two proposed budget years_ <br />Park Dedication Fees (aka "Quimby Fees"), which are assessed on new residential construction, were <br />a tremendous source of revenue for new park land acquisition and park development as the <br />community was growing. However, since the Conejo Valley is approaching build -out, those once <br />reliable revenues continue to dwindle and are no longer a sufficient source of income for capital <br />projects as well as necessary infrastructure improvement and replacement projects. <br />HILLCREST CENTER 403 WEST HILLCREST DRIVE, THOUSAND OAKS, CALIFORNIA 91360-4223 <br />(805) 495-6471 FAX: (805) 497-3199 E-MAIL:parks@crpd.org <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.