Laserfiche WebLink
Exhibit 1, Table 2, shows the vast difference between doing nothing (unmitigated water use utilizing actual 2007 <br />units —1 unit of water equals 748 gallons - per acre rate) and progressively reducing water use per acre (mitigated <br />water use utilizing actual and projected units per acre rate from Table 1). The column to the far right depicts the <br />quantity of this difference. If no improvements are made on water use within the District, use would increase to <br />approximately 80,000 units (nearly 60,000,000 gallons) and $450,000 more per year above the projected goal. <br />Conclusion <br />The District is committed to resource utilization, water cost savings, and striving to become an environmentally <br />considerate and sustainable operation. However, there are no simple easy avenues to meet this commitment; the <br />District already limits irrigation of park landscaping so that the health of the grass and landscaping is near failure <br />level. Irrigating at the bare minimum, coupled with a further reduction, would result in significant turf damage and <br />lead to a difficult recovery. <br />Staff is continuously making efforts to balance aggressive water conservation efforts with turf quality and <br />playability; the recent and continuing drought conditions make it prudent for staff to develop, consider, and <br />implement an effective Water Conservation Plan. <br />In order to monitor efforts, monthly reports of the District's water use, water savings projects, and activities to date <br />will be provided to the Board and published. The Water Conservation Plan will be updated and submitted to the <br />Board on an annual basis. <br />�8 <br />