Laserfiche WebLink
Rochelle Callis <br />CRPD Therapeutic Recreation Program Final Report and Recommendations <br />September 8, 2017 page 25 <br />CATEGORY 5: Collaborative Programs <br />Approach to Collaboration with Other Agencies: most collaborate with other entities. Some do so to <br />gain access to facilities such as schools or facilities they do not have, others do so to expand the <br />number of program offerings, and others do so because it increases awareness. <br />Summer Collaboration: the response varied. Two (SRACLC and Rockford) had joint summer programs <br />or activities with the schools. Eugene is trying to develop this too. Santa Barbara has a no -fee drop-in <br />program at schools. Others managed their own programs. <br />CATEGORY 6: Transportation <br />Owned Vehicles: the response varied. SRACLC has six vehicles and qualified drivers. Rockford has one. <br />Eugene has two. Santa Barbara has a 40 seat bus. Oxnard has vans but none are lift -equipped. RSRPD <br />and CRPD do not have transportation in the programs for people with disabilities. CRPD TR has access <br />to two vans, and regularly employed staffs are required to attain the proper driver's license. There is, <br />however, no dedicated TR driver, meaning that for every hour an employee drives, he or she is closer <br />to the 30 -hour maximum. <br />Provides Door -to -Door Transportation: only two do so and not for all programs (Rockford, SRACLC). <br />One provides curb -to -curb transportation. CRPD provides this service for some who live independently <br />of family, or for those who cannot drive. The other California agencies do not provide this service. <br />CATEGORY 7: Recreation Inclusion Support <br />Supports Inclusive Participation: not every agency described supports for inclusive participation. <br />Eugene, Rockford, and the Illinois JPA all had strong systems in place. California agencies had disparate <br />approaches, with CRPD and Santa Barbara having the greatest awareness of this mandate. <br />Inclusion Lead Staff: those entities that support inclusion had a full-time person assigned to this area, <br />and in one instance, that employee had other duties. Credentials ranged from RTC to CTRS to a <br />behavior management credential. <br />Inclusion Assessments: a divide occurs here. Out of California, all agencies had a centralized inclusion <br />process, where staffs with a therapeutic recreation background and credential conducted assessments <br />of registrants, and created plans. In California, while Santa Barbara and CRPD leaned that way, <br />program and facility staffs with no disability experience often performed those tasks, without even a <br />consult by therapeutic recreation staffs. We believe this is an inadequate approach, and yields <br />inconsistent results. <br />THE W -T GROr <br />DBA RECREATION ACCESSIBILITY CONSULT' i .0 <br />ONE SOURCE. INFINITE SOLUTIONS. <br />